геология и разведка
Preview

Proceedings of higher educational establishments. Geology and Exploration

Advanced search

Classification of physico-geological models

https://doi.org/10.32454/0016-7762-2023-65-4-37-45

Abstract

Background. A new classification of physico-geological models (PhGM) is presented, which includes system series of models of physico-chemical indicators, geological objects, and geological processes. Such system series models are characterized by physical-mathematical and geotectonic features.

Aim. Generalization and systematization of existing models and introduction of new model types, which were not previously considered, to propose a new classification of PhGM.

Materials and methods. Scientific publications, including those published by the authors, devoted to the description of various types of models. A systematic review of published data was used as a research method.

Results. The proposed classification of PhGM includes system series of models of physico-chemical indicators, geological objects, and geological processes characterized by physico-mathematical and tectonic features.

Conclusion. A new classification of PhGM is proposed. This classification generalizes the system series of models of physico-chemical indicators and various geological and physical images. System series of models for diamond-bearing kimberlite pipes and earthquakes are presented.

About the Authors

V. М. Bondarenko
Sergo Ordzhonikidze Russian State University for Geological Prospecting
Russian Federation

Vladimir M. Bondarenko — Dr. of Sci. (Technical), Professor of the Department Geophysics

23, Miklukho-Maklaya str., Moscow 117997

tel.: +7 (916) 674-19-77



L. Shavier
Sergo Ordzhonikidze Russian State University for Geological Prospecting
Russian Federation

Lusia Shavier  — post-graduate researcher of the Department Geophysics 

23, Miklukho-Maklaya str., Moscow 117997



References

1. Bondarenko V.M., Demidovich O.A., Tarkhov A.G. The first results of complex application of geophysical methods for direct prospecting of diamond deposits in Yakut USSR // Proceedings of higher educational establishments. Geology and Exploration. 1961.No. 2. P. 118—132 (In Russian).

2. Bondarenko V.M. So Min Tu. Physico-geological models of gold and tin-tungsten deposits of the Union of Myanmar // Proceedings of higher educational establishments. Geology and Exploration. 2010. No. 3. P. 52—58 (In Russian).

3. Bondarenko V.M., Xavier L.de J.A. Dynamic model of education kimberlite explosion tubes. XIV International Scientific and Practical Conference “New ideas in Earth Sciences”. Moscow: MGRI-RGGRU Publishing House, 2019. P. 349—352 (In Russian).

4. Vakhromeev G.S. General principles of integration of geophysical methods in the search for ore deposits. Irkutsk, Ed. Irkutsk Polytechnic University. 1970. 119 p. (In Russian).

5. Zagayny A.K., Mikoev I.I., Usinov V.N., et al. Structural and tectonic and geophysical prerequisites for the localization of kimberlites on the territory of Angola // Ores and Metals. 2017. No. 4. P. 42—49 (In Russian).

6. Zinchuk N.N. Features of the use of standard models of kimberlite pipes in the search for diamonds // Bulletin of VSU. Series: Geology. 2011. No. 1. P. 133— 144 (In Russian).

7. Nikitin A.A., Khmelevskoy V.K. Integration of geophysical methods Moscow: VNIIgeosystem, 2012. 346 p. (In Russian).

8. Pervov V.A., Somov S.V., Korshunov A.V., et al. Kimberlite Cathode Tube (Republic of Angola): paleovolcanological model of formation // Geology of ore deposits. 2011. Vol. 53. No. 4. P. 330—345 (In Russian).

9. Portnov A.M. Kimberlites — mantle fluidisites // Nature. 2012. No. 12. P. 42—48 (In Russian).

10. Potapov A.D. Earthquakes — causes and consequences. Moscow: Higher School, 2009. 246 p. (In Russian).

11. Serokurov Yu.N., Kalmykov V.D. On the structural control of kimberlite magmatism in the province of Luanda Norte (Angola) // Russian Geology, 2004, No. 6, P. 78—82 (In Russian).

12. Sobolev G.A. Fundamentals of earthquake prediction. Moscow: Nauka, 2003. 312 p. (In Russian).

13. Tarkhov A.G., Bondarenko V.M., Nikitin A.A. Principles of integration in exploration geophysics. Moscow: Nedra, 1977. 165 p. (In Russian).

14. Harkiv A.D., Zinchuk N.N., Kryuchkov A.I., Indigenous diamond deposits of the world. Moscow: Nedra Publ. House, 1998. 555 p. (In Russian).

15. Xavier L.de Zh.A, Bondarenko V.M. Model of formation of favorable conditions in the Earth’s mantle for the formation of indigenous diamond deposits on the territory of Angola. XIV International Scientific and Practical Conference “New ideas in Earth Sciences”. Moscow: MGRI-RGGRU Publ. House, 2019. P. 495— 497 (In Russian).

16. Jelsma H., Barnett W., Richards S., Lister G. Tectonic setting of kimberlites. Lithos 112S, 2009. P. 155— 165.

17. Le Roux C.L., Steenkamp W.H. Geophysical charakteristics of a few Angolan kimberlite Examples. Procedings of the GSSA Kimberley Diamond Symposium. 11—13 Sept. 2014. P. 1—5.

18. Pettit W. Geophysical signatures of some recently discovered large (>40 ha) kimberlite pipes on the Alto Cuilo concession in northeastern Angola. Lithos 112S, 2009. P. 106—115.


Review

For citations:


Bondarenko V.М., Shavier L. Classification of physico-geological models. Proceedings of higher educational establishments. Geology and Exploration. 2023;(4):37-45. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.32454/0016-7762-2023-65-4-37-45

Views: 581


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 0016-7762 (Print)
ISSN 2618-8708 (Online)