Definition of weakened zones from the standpoint of engineering geology and hydrogeology
https://doi.org/10.32454/0016-7762-2023-65-4-89-96
Abstract
Background. In recent decades, the concept of weakened zones has become widespread in various fields of Earth science. Thus, this concept is currently used in geology, mining, geomechanics, tectonics, geodynamics, and seismology. As a result, weakened zones can be considered and interpreted both as large fault zones, including dilatancy zones, and zones with sharply or quite noticeably changing physical and mechanical properties. At the same time, the purpose of studying and recording such zones also changes, depending on particular research tasks.
Aim. To consider structures that are widely termed as weakened zones, although having received no clear definition and classification. To provide a definition of this term from the standpoint of hydrogeology and engineering geology.
Materials and methods. The research basis was formed by the author’s long-term experience in the selection of sites for the location of nuclear energy facilities. The main methods included collection, generalization, and processing of information obtained by the author during fieldwork and laboratory research.
Results. The author considers structures that are termed as weakened zones in Earth sciences, concerning a fairly wide range of structures and conditions of mountain ranges and soils. A definition of a weakened zone from the standpoint of hydrogeology and engineering geology is proposed. Various factors indicating the presence of weakened zones and possible negative consequences for engineering structures are considered.
Conclusion. The concept of weakened zones should be taken into consideration when conducting detailed surveys of areas for the location of engineering facilities. It is noted that, when carrying out detailed surveys, the key to quantifying the characteristics of weakened zones in dispersed soils consists in a correct assessment of the spatial variability of soil parameters, largely the density of dry soil and porosity.
Keywords
About the Author
А. S. GuseltsevRussian Federation
Alexandr S. Guseltsev — Cand. of Sci. (Geol.-Min.), Head of the Laboratory of the Department of Accounting for External Interactions
2/8, bld. 5, Malaya Krasnoselskaya str., Moscow 107140
tel.: +7 (916) 577-54-03
References
1. Alekhin V.I. Faults of the earth’s crust as zones of environmental risk // El. magazine «Problems of Ecology». DonNTU. 2004. No. 1—2.
2. Belonosov A.Y., Kurchikov A.R. Technology of integrated research for prospecting, exploration and additional exploration of oil fields in Western Siberia // NIIGiG Tyumen State Oil and Gas University. Bulletin of the subsoil user of the Khanty-Mansi Autonomous Okrug, No. 7, 2001, pp. 58—60.
3. Goldberg V.M., Gazda S. Hydrogeological foundations of underground water protection from pollution. M.: Nedra, 1984. 263 p.
4. GOST 20522-2012. Soils. Methods for statistical processing of test results.
5. Guseltsev A.S., Pendin V.V., Barulin G.P., Gorobtsov D.N. Assessment of spatial variability of the properties of foundation soils during the siting of nuclear power plants. Izvestiya vuzov. Geology and exploration. 2017. No. 6. P. 35—41.
6. Dmitriev V.V., Yarg L.A. Methods and quality of laboratory soil study: textbook. M.: KDU, 2008. 542 p.
7. Ermakov N.I. Geomechanics and competitiveness of mining enterprises in the Urals. Ekaterinburg: Institute of Mining URORAN, 2004.
8. Makeev V.M., Guseltsev A.S., Kravchenko I.M. The problem of identifying weakened zones when studying engineering-geological conditions (using the example of the territory of the Bushehr NPP) // Geoecology, engineering geology, hydrogeology, geocryology. 2020. No. 5.
9. Pendin V.V., Guseltsev A.S. Organization of underground hydrosphere management at nuclear power facilities (using the example of NPP «Bushehr») // Engineering Geology. 2006. November. pp. 21—32.
10. Safety Guide for the Use of Nuclear Energy «Assessment of the initial seismicity of the area and site of a nuclear facility during engineering surveys and research». RB-019-18 (As amended by Rostechnadzor order dated May 11, 2018 No. 208).
11. Sotnikov V.I. Main trends in the development of the theory of ore formation. Novosibirsk State University, Geosciences, 1996.
Review
For citations:
Guseltsev А.S. Definition of weakened zones from the standpoint of engineering geology and hydrogeology. Proceedings of higher educational establishments. Geology and Exploration. 2023;(4):89-96. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.32454/0016-7762-2023-65-4-89-96