Hydrothermal alteration and mineralization of the prospects at the northern flank of the Baimka ore zone, Western Chukotka

Background. Some papers describing the deposits and prospects in the Baimka ore zone (Baimka Trend), the Chukotka Autonomous Region have been recently published. It should be noted that those publications concern with the large Peschanka porphyry copper-molybdenum-gold deposit and Nakhodka ore field. At the same time, some copper prospects were found at the zone flanks and their nature is not clear. There are no data available in the literature that would clarify the mineralogy of hydrothermal alteration and ores at those prospects, including Top and Luchik located at the northern flank. To understand the nature of these prospects, we studied in depth mineralogy of hydrothermal alteration and ores.
Aim. This study aims to describe mineralogy of metasomatic rocks and ores from the Top and Luchik prospects in the northern part of the Baimka zone, Western Chukotka.
Materials and methods. Several dozen polished thin sections were microscopic studied at the Department of Mineralogy of Moscow State University using an optical microscope. The chemical composition of minerals was determined using electron microprobe at the Laboratory of Analytical Techniques of High Spatial Resolution, Department of Petrology and Volcanology, Moscow State University.
Results. It was found that propylitic is the major hydrothermal alteration at the prospects studied here. Metasomatic rocks are cut by mineralized quartz and carbonate-quartz veins. Chalcopyrite and pyrite are the major ore minerals; galena, sphalerite, pyrite enriched in As and Sb, and marcasite are minor; Hg-bearing tetrahedrite-(Zn), native gold with the fineness of ~830, petzite, hessite, and acanthite are rare.
Conclusions. The data obtained suggest that mineralization at the Top and Luchik prospect is attributed to the epithermal intermediate sulfidation type. Considering the occurrence of the epithermal mineralization in the upper part of the hydrothermal column and the porphyry mineralization in the Baimka zone, the porphyry mineralization is possible at depth at the Top and Luchik prospects.

1. Gamyanin G.N., Goryachev N.A. Tipomorfizm arsenopirita mestorozhdenij zolota i serebra SeveroVostoka Azii // Materialy Vserossijskoj konferencii «Samorodnoe zoloto: tipomorfizm mineral’nykh associacii, usloviya obrazovaniya mestorozhdenii, zadachi prikladnykh issledovanii» 29—31 marta 2010 g. Moscow: IGEM, 2010. V. 1. P. 327.

2. Goryachev N.A., Gamyanin G.N., Prokofev V.Yu., Savva N.E., Velivetskaya T.A., Ignat’ev A.V. Silvercobalt mineralization in the Upper Seymchan ore cluster, Northeastern Russia // Geol. Ore Deposits, 2014. V. 56. No. 5. P. 322–345.

3. Goryachev N.A., Sidorov A.A., Volkov A.V., Gamyanin G.N., Savva N.E., Okrugin V.M. Au-Agorudenenie vulkanogennykh poyasov SeveroVostoka Azii // Vulkanizm i geodinamika: Materialy IV Vserossijskogo simpoziuma po vulkanologii I paleovulkanologii. Petropavlovsk-Kamchatskij: IViS DVO RAN, 2009. V. 1. P. 11—15.

4. Kolova E.E., Savva N.E. Sootnoshenie medno-molibden-porfirovogo i zolotogo orudeneniya na p-ovah Koni i P’jagina (Severnoe Priohot’e) // Vestnik SVNC DVO RAN. 2008. No. 4. P. 2—15.

5. Maruschenko L.I. The mineralogy of propylites of the large Peschanka porphyry copper deposit (West Chukotka) // Moscow Univ. Geol. Bull., 2013. V. 68. No. 2. P. 79—88

6. Nagornaja E.V. Mineralogija i zonal’nost’ molibden-medno-porfirovogo rudnogo polja Nahodka, Chukotka: avtoref. dis. kand. geol.-min. nauk. Moscow, 2013. 27 p.

7. Nagornaja E.V. Evolyuciya himicheskogo sostava bleklyh rud medno-molibden-porfirovyh mestorozhdenii Nahodkinskogo rudnogo polya // Razvedka i Okhrana Nedr. 2011. No. 8. P. 11—16.

8. Nikolaev Yu.N., Baksheev I.A., Prokofiev V.Yu., Nagornaya E.V., Marushchenko L.I., Sidorina Yu.N., Chitalin A. F., Kal’koa I.A. Gold–silver mineralization in porphyry-epithermal systems of the Baimka Trend, Western Chukchi Peninsula, Russia // Geol. Ore Deposits, 2016. V. 58. No. 4. P. 284–307.

9. Savva N.E., Volkov A.V., Sidorov A.A., Kolova E.E., Murashov K.Yu. Primorskoe epithermal Ag-Au deposit (Northeastern Russia): Geological setting, mineralogy, geochemistry, and ore formation conditions // Geol. Ore Deposits, 2016. V. 61. No. 1. P. 50–73.

10. Trushin S.I., Kirillov V.E., Buhanova D.S., Chubarov V.M. Mineralogicheskie osobennosti zolotykh rud Albazinskogo i Ul’banskogo rudnyh rajonov (Habarovskii krai) // Region. Geologiya i Metallogeniya. 2019. No. 78. P. 91—97.

11. Filimonov S.V. Mineraly gruppy bleklykh rud — indikatory rudogeneza (na primere gidrotermal’nykh mestorozhdenij zolota: avtoref. dis. kand. geol.-miner. nauk. Moscow, 2009. 25 p.

12. Bayliss P. Nomenclature of the trioctahedral chlorites // Can. Miner., 1975. V. 13. P. 178—180.

13. Baksheev I.A., Vlasov E.A., Nikolaev Yu.N., Krivitskaya N.N., Koshlyakova N.N., Nagornaya E.V., Kara T.V., Dzhedzheya G.T. Mineralogy of the Tumanny Au-Ag-Te-Hg epithermal veins, Western Chukchi Peninsula, Russia // Ore Geology Reviews, 2018. V. 101. P. 293—311.

14. Biagioni C., Sejkora J., Musetti S., Velebil D., Pasero M. Tetrahedrite-(Hg), a new ‘old’ member of the tetrahedrite group // Mineralogical Magazine, 2020. V. 84. P. 584—592.

15. Cline J.S., Hofstra A.H., Muntean J.L., Tosdal R.M., Hickey K.A. Carlin-Type Gold Deposits in Nevada: Critical Geologic Characteristics and Viable Models. Society of Economic Geologists, 2005. P. 451—484.

16. Fleet M.E., Mumin A.H. Gold-bearing arsenian pyrite and marcasite and arsenopyrite from Carlin Trend gold deposits and laboratory synthesis. American Mineralogist. 1997. V. 82. P. 182—193.

17. Foit, F.F. Jr., Ulbricht, M.E. Compositional variation in mercurian tetrahedrite-tennantite from epithermal deposits of the Steens and Pueblo Mountains, Harney County, Oregon. Can. Mineral. 2001. V. 39. P. 819—830.

18. Jurković I.B. Geochemical characteristics of mercurian tetrahedrite, barite and fluorite from the Duboki Vagan, Glumac and Dubrave-Dugi Dol barite deposits, south of Kreševo, Mid-Bosnian Schist Mts // Geologia Croatica. 2011. V. 64. P. 49—59.

19. Leake B.E., Woolley A.R., Birch W.D., Burke E.A.J., Ferraris G., Grice J.D., Hawthorne F.C., Kisch H.J., Krivovichev V.G., Schumacher J.C., Stephenson N.C.N., Whittaker E.J.W. Nomenclature of amphiboles: additions and revisions to the International Mineralogical Association’s amphibole nomenclature // Mineral. Mag. 2004. V. 68. P. 209—215.

20. Leake B.E., Woolley A.R., Arps C.E.S., Birch W.D., Gilbert M.C., Grice J.D., Hawthorne F.C., Kato A., Kisch H.J., Krivovichev V.G., Linthout K., Laird J., Mandarino J.A., Maresch W.V., Nickel E.H., Rock N.M.S., Schumacher J.C., Smith D.C., Stephenson N.C.N.J., Ungaretti L., Whittaker E.J.W., Youzhi G. Nomenclature of amphiboles; report of the Subcommittee on Amphiboles of the International Mineralogical Association Commission on new minerals and mineral names // Mineral. Mag. 1997. V. 61. P. 295—321.

21. Marushchenko L.I., Baksheev I.A., Nagornaya E.V., Chitalin A.F., Nikolaev Yu.N., Vlasov E.A. Compositional evolution of the tetrahedrite solid solution in porphyry-epithermal system: A case study of the Baimka Cu-Mo-Au trend, Chukchi Peninsula, Russia // Ore Geology Reviews. 2017. P. 21—37.

22. Sillitoe R.H., Hedenquest J.W. Linkages between volcanotectonic settings, orefluid compositions, and epitermal precious metal deposits // Soc. Econ. Geol. Spes. Publ. 2003. V. 10. P. 315—343.

23. Sillitoe R.H. Porphyry copper systems // Econ. Geol. 2010. V. 105. P. 3—41.