Formation conditions and evolution of oil and gas source strata of the Laptev sea shelf ore and gas province
https://doi.org/10.32454/0016-7762-2020-63-3-46-59
Abstract
Introduction. To date, no unified well-established concepts have been developed regarding the oil and gas geological zoning of the Laptev Sea shelf, as well as other seas of the Eastern Arctic. Different groups of researchers define this region either as an independently promising oil and gas region [7, 8], or as a potential oil and gas basin [1].
Aim. To construct spatio-temporal digital models of sedimentary basins and hydrocarbon systems for the main horizons of oil and gas source rocks. A detailed analysis of information on oil and gas content, the gas chemical study of sediments, the characteristics of the component composition and thermal regime of the Laptev sea shelf water area raises the question on the conditions for the formation and evolution of oil and gas source strata within the studied promising oil and gas province. The conducted research made it possible to study the regional trends in oil and gas content, the features of the sedimentary cover formation and the development of hydrocarbon systems in the area under study.
Materials and methods. The materials of production reports obtained for individual large objects in the water area were the source of initial information. The basin analysis was based on a model developed by Equinor specialists (Somme et al., 2018) [14—17], covering the time period from the Triassic to Paleogene inclusive and taking into account the plate-tectonic reconstructions. The resulting model included four main sedimentary complexes: pre-Aptian, Apt-Upper Cretaceous, Paleogene, and Neogene-Quaternary.
Results. The calculation of numerical models was carried out in two versions with different types of kerogen from the oil and gas source strata corresponding to humic and sapropel organic matter. The results obtained indicated that the key factor controlling the development of hydrocarbon systems was the sinking rate of the basins and the thickness of formed overburden complexes, as well as the geothermal field of the Laptev Sea.
Conclusion. The analysis of the results obtained allowed the most promising research objects to be identified. The main foci of hydrocarbon generation in the Paleogene and Neogene complexes and the areas of the most probable accumulation were determined. Significant hydrocarbon potential is expected in the Paleogene clinoforms of the Eastern Arctic.
Keywords
About the Authors
V. Yu. KerimovRussian Federation
Vagif Yu. Kerimov — Dr. of Sci. (Geol.-Min.), Prof., academician of the Russian Academy of Natural Sciences, Head of the Department of Geology and Exploration of Hydrocarbon Deposits Sergo Ordzhonikidze Russian State University for Geological Prospecting
23, Miklukho-Maklaya str., Moscow 117997
SPIN: 9696-1364
Yu. V. Shcherbina
Russian Federation
Yulia V. Shcherbina — leading specialist in the Department of fundamental and applied scientific research
23, Miklukho-Maklaya str., Moscow 117997
SPIN: 3225-9373
A. A. Ivanov
Russian Federation
Andrey A. Ivanov — head of the Faculty of Geology and Geophysics of Oil and Gas
23, Miklukho-Maklaya str., Moscow 117997
SPIN: 9977-2363
References
1. Atlas of paleogeographic maps of Eurasian shelves in the Mesozoic and Cenozoic. Chapter 1. Llandudno: Robertson Group and Federal State Budgetary Institution of Science Geological Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 1992. (In Russian).
2. Belonin M.D., Grigorenko Yu.N., Margulis L.S., et al. Exploration potential of Western Kamchatka and the adjacent shelf. Saint Peterburg: “Nedra”, 2003. 120 p. (In Russian).
3. Gasheva I.M., Lopatin B.G., Sokolov R.I. Geological map of Russia and adjacent water areas. Compiled and prepared for publishing by the All-Russian Research Geological Institute in 1983; 1: 10,000,000. 1995. (In Russian).
4. Dvali M.F. Geological structure of the Palansky region (western coast of the Kamchatka Peninsula) // “Proceedings All-Russian Petroleum Research Geological Prospecting Institute. 1957. Issue 102. 124 p. (In Russian).
5. Zharov A.E., Koroleva N.V., Chuiko L.S., Stepanova E.V., Kruglyak V.F., Sergienko T.N., et al. Report on the results of geological and economic assessment of local oil and gas promising objects on the shelves of the Far Eastern seas, reassessment of hydrocarbon resource potential and pre-tender preparation of the geological basis of the Sakhalin-5, -6 competitive site; assessment of predicted hydrocarbon resources on the shelf of South-West Sakhalin. Federal state unitary enterprise «Dalmorneftegeofizika», Yuzhno-Sakhalinsk, 2003. Federal state unitary research and production enterprise «Rosgeolfond», Research and Production Enterprise Center for Marine Geological and Geophysical Data, Federal State Institution “Sakhalin Territorial Fund of Geological Information”. (In Russian).
6. Kerimov V.Yu., Kuznetsov N.B., et al. Report “Substantiate areas of probable hydrocarbon accumulation on the shelf of the Okhort Sea based on the use of modern oil and gas forecasting technologies” Gubkin Russian State University of Oil and Gas. Moscow, 2014. Russian Federal Geological Fund. (In Russian).
7. Kim B.I., Evdokimova N.K. Geology and oil and gas potential of the Laptev Sea closure of the Eurasian basin. Geology of oil and gas. 2010. No. 2. P. 3—10. (In Russian).
8. Lukina N.V., Makarov V.I., Trifonov V.G., Volchkova G.I. Correlation of tectonic events of the newest stage of the Earth’s development. Moscow: Science, 1985. 174 p. (In Russian).
9. Poludetkina E.N. Geochemical prerequisites for the oil and gas content of the Anadyr basin. Dissertation for the degree of Cand. geol.-min. sciences. Moscow, 2007. 150 p. (In Russian).
10. Sitnikov V.S., Alekseev N.N., Arzhakov N.A., Obolkin A.P., Pavlova K.A., Sevostyanova R.F., Sleptsova M.I. About the structure and prospects of oil and gas content of the offshore Arctic territories of Eastern Yakutia // Science and Education. 2017. No. 4. P. 50—59. (In Russian).
11. Shcherban O.V. Geochemistry of organic matter, oils and gases of the Cenozoic sediments of the Anadyr, Khatyr and Yamsk-Taui sedimentary basins (in connection with the assessment of the conditions of oil and gas formation). Dissertation for the scientific degree of candidate of geological and mineralogical sciences. Dagestan Scientific Center of the Academy of Sciences of the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics Magadan, 1985. (In Russian).
12. Kerimov, V.Y., Bondarev, A.V., Mustaev, R.N. Estimation of geological risks in searching and exploration of hydrocarbon deposits // Neftyanoe Khozyaystvo — Oil Industry. 2017. No 8. P. 36—41.
13. Kerimov V.Yu., Bondarev, A.V., Sizikov, E.A., Sinyavskaya, O.S., Makarova, A.Yu. The conditions of formation and evolution of hydrocarbon systems in Sakhalin shelf, the Sea of Okhotsk // Neftyanoe Khozyaystvo — Oil Industry. 2015. No. 8. P. 22—27.
14. Kerimov V.Yu., Gordadze G.N., Mustaev R.N., Bondarev A.V. Formation Conditions of Hydrocarbon Systems on the Sakhalin Shelf of the Sea of Okhotsk Based on the Geochemical Studies and Modeling // Orient J Chem. 2018. No 34(2). P. 934—947.
15. Kerimov V.Yu., Leonov M.G., Osipov A.V., Mustaev R.N., Vu Nam Hai. Hydrocarbons in the Basement of the South China Sea (Vietnam) Shelf and StructuralTectonic Model of their Formations // Geotectonics. 2019. Vol. 52(1). P. 42—59.
16. Sizikov E.A., Kerimov V.Yu., Bondarev A.V., Khoshtaria V.N. Modeling Zone’s of Hydrocarbon generation in Sakhalin shelf of Okhotsk Sea Geomodel // 2016 — 18th Science and Applied Research Conference on Oil and Gas Geological Exploration and Development.
17. Sømme T.O., Dor´e A.G., Lundin E.R., Tørudbakken B.O. Triassic-Paleogene paleogeography of the Arctic: Implications for sediment routing and basin fill // AAPG Bulletin. Vol. 102. No. 12 (December 2018). P. 2481—2517.
Review
For citations:
Kerimov V.Yu., Shcherbina Yu.V., Ivanov A.A. Formation conditions and evolution of oil and gas source strata of the Laptev sea shelf ore and gas province. Proceedings of higher educational establishments. Geology and Exploration. 2020;(3):46-59. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.32454/0016-7762-2020-63-3-46-59