геология и разведка
Preview

Proceedings of higher educational establishments. Geology and Exploration

Advanced search

The first data on the role of rhyncholites in the process of epibiota

https://doi.org/10.32454/0016-7762-2019-5-5-9

Abstract

For the first time the role of rhyncholites in the process of epibiota has been figured out. Serpulidae inlay is detected in 39 rhyncholites of 979 specimens, representing 4% of the all studied material. This fact demonstrates that rhyncholites were used extremely rarely by encrusting species as a substrate. No other epibionts were found. Polychaetes were found in the genus Hadrocheilus (87%) and in the genus Akidocheilus. Size of the inlaid rhyncholites ranges from 7 to 23 mm. Serpulidae cover usually only the ventral side of rhyncholites, herewith, at 48,7% of the samples epibionts with different degrees of intensity are developed throughout the ventral surface, at 30,7% of the samples they are observed only on the ventral side of the hood and at 20,6% serpulidae are present only on the ventral surface of the arm. At four exemplars of the genus Hadrocheilus (10 % of the total amount) polychaetes are developed on the dorsal surface, but they are always and usually very wide developed on the ventral side of rhyncholites. No samples were found in which serpulidae were found only on the dorsal surface. Among the remains of polychaete worms, large and small tubes were identified and described. The presence of serpulidae on the handle of rhyncholites, that during the life of the cephalopod mollusk was located in a horny jaw, is a clear indication of the settlement’s epibionts on isolated skeletal structures of the already dead cephalopod. Cases when serpulidae are observed only on the ventral side of the hood in representatives of the genus Akidocheilus, suggest that planktonic trochophore – larvae of polychaetes can settle on the inner surface of the mandible of living ammonoids, where they turned into an adult worm. At the same time, polychaetes gained access not only to traditional prey, represented by various microscopic organisms, but also to additional food resources associated with the life activity of cephalopodas.

About the Authors

E. S. Gaponenko
Sergo Ordzhonikidze Russian State University for Geological Prospecting
Russian Federation
23, Miklouho-Maklay’s street, Moscow 117997


M. A. Ulshin
Sergo Ordzhonikidze Russian State University for Geological Prospecting
Russian Federation
23, Miklouho-Maklay’s street, Moscow 117997


V. N. Komarov
Sergo Ordzhonikidze Russian State University for Geological Prospecting
Russian Federation
23, Miklouho-Maklay’s street, Moscow 117997


References

1. Gekker R.F. Phenomena of accretion and attachment among the upper Devonian fauna and flora of the Main Devonian field. Essays on ethology and ecology of the Paleozoic seas population of the Russian platform. Proceedings of the Paleozoological institute, 1935, vol. 4, pp. 159–280 (in Russian).

2. Gekker R.F. Tafonomicheskie i ekologicheskie osobennosti fauni i flori Glavnogo devonskogo polya. [Taphonomic and ecological features of the fauna and flora of the Main Devonian field]. Moscow: Science (Publ.), 1983. 144 p. (in Russian).

3. Ivanov A.V. Clarify the systematic composition of the marine paleobiots based on the analysis of epibiontia (for example oyster).Proceedings of higher educational establishments. Geology and Exploration, 2003, no. 6, pp. 43–45 (In Russian).

4. Ivanov A.V., Pervushov E.M. Some results of the study of attached representatives of late Cretaceous marine fauna. Scientific notes of the faculty of Geology of Saratov state University, 1997, new series, issue 1, pp. 19–28 (In Russian).

5. Komarov V.N. The new representative of the subgenus Hadrocheilus (Microbeccus) (rhyncholites) from the upper Barremian deposits of the Mountain Crimea. Izvestiya vysshikh uchebnykh zavedeniy.Geologiya i razvedka — [Proceedings of higher educational establishments. Geology and Exploration], 1998, no. 3, pp. 151–153 (in Russian).

6. Komarov V.N. Opredelitel rinholitov Yugo-Zapadnogo Krima. Uchebnoe posobie. [The determinant of rhyncholites of South-Western Crimea. Textbook]. Moscow: Dialogue–MSU (Publ.), 1999. 38 p. (in Russian).

7. Komarov V.N. The new representative of the subgenus Hadrocheilus (Microbeccus) (rhyncholites) from the upper Barremian deposits of the Mountain Crimea. Izvestiya vysshikh uchebnykh zavedeniy.Geologiya i razvedka — [Proceedings of higher educational establishments. Geology and Exploration], 2001, no. 5, pp. 58–65 (in Russian).

8. Komarov V.N. The first finding of rhyncholites in the middle Jurassic of the Mountain Crimea. Paleontologicheskij zhurnal. [Paleontological journal], 2002, no. 4, pp. 21–22 (in Russian).

9. Komarov V.N. The new representative of the subgenus Hadrocheilus (Microbeccus) (rhyncholites) from the upper Barremian deposits of the Mountain Crimea. Izvestiya vysshikh uchebnykh zavedeniy.Geologiya i razvedka — [Proceedings of higher educational establishments. Geology and Exploration], 2004, no. 2, pp. 82 (in Russian).

10. Komarov V.N. Atlas rinholitov Gornogo Krima. [Atlas of rhyncholites of Mountain Crimea]. Moscow: CIPC (Publ.), 2008. 120 p. (in Russian).

11. Korobkov I.A. Vvedenie v izuchenie iskopaemih mollyuskov. [Introduction to the study of fossil mollusks]. Leningrad: Publishing house of LGU, 1950. 283 p. (in Russian).

12. Markovsky B.P. Metodi biofacialnogo analiza. [Methods of biofacial analysis]. Moscow: Nedra (Publ.), 1966. 271 p. (in Russian).

13. Celcer V.B., Ivanov A.V. The results of the analysis of the attachment of the Callovian Gryphaea of the Volga region. Questions of paleontology and stratigraphy, 1998, new series, issue 1, pp. 35–40 (in Russian).

14. Khuzina R.I., Komarov V.N. Rhyncholites and the problem of broad and narrow understanding of the taxa. Komarov V.N. The new representative of the subgenus Hadrocheilus (Microbeccus) (rhyncholites) from the upper Barremian deposits of the Mountain Crimea. Izvestiya vysshikh uchebnykh zavedeniy.Geologiya i razvedka — [Proceedings of higher educational establishments. Geology and Exploration], 2018, no. 1, pp. 12–17 (in Russian).

15. Shimansky V.N. To the question of taxonomy of rhyncholites. Dokladi AN SSSR (Reports of the USSR Academy of Sciences), 1947, vol. 58, no. 7, pp. 1475–1478. (in Russian).

16. Shimansky V.N. On systematic position of rhyncholites. Trudy Paleontologicheskogo instituta AN SSSR. (Proc. of Paleontological Institute of USSR Academy of sciences), 1949, vol. 20, pp. 199– 208. (in Russian).

17. Shimansky V.N. Historical change of rhyncholites. Iskopaemie golovonogie mollyuski. [Fossil cephalopods]. Moscow: Science (Publ.), 1985, pp. 155–167(in Russian).

18. Shimansky V.N., Alekseev A.S. Rhyncholites from Danish stage of Crimea. Razvitie i smena organicheskogo mira na rubezhe mezozoja i kajnozoja. [Development and change of the organic world at the turn of the Mesozoic and Cenozoic]. Moscow: Science (Publ.), 1975, pp. 87–90 (In Russian).

19. Shimansky V.N., Nerodenko V.M. A new subgenus of rhyncholites Microbeccus from the early Cretaceous. Paleontologicheskii jurnal (Paleontological journal), 1983, no. 4, pp. 36–41 (in Russian).


Review

For citations:


Gaponenko E.S., Ulshin M.A., Komarov V.N. The first data on the role of rhyncholites in the process of epibiota. Proceedings of higher educational establishments. Geology and Exploration. 2019;(5):5-9. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.32454/0016-7762-2019-5-5-9

Views: 414


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 0016-7762 (Print)
ISSN 2618-8708 (Online)