ON METHODOLOGY OF TEACHING GEOPHYSICAL COURSES AT THE INSTITUTE OF EARTH SCIENCES, SFU
https://doi.org/10.32454/0016-7762-2018-4-68-76
Abstract
The results of the works undertaken by students on practical classes and during educational practices have been discussed. Causes and difficulties in student learning of exploratory geophysics have been analyzed. It has been found a deficiency in practical skills of future engineers relevant to the work with geophysical facilities and equipment and further mental processing of the measured parameters of natural and artificial geophysical fields. A brief description has been given for improvements in the methodology of teaching geophysics to future geology and geoecology engineers via inclusion of practical works with geophysical equipment on the test site on the Zorge Street with tasks linked to engineering-geological cross-section study and mapping underground infrastructure on the given area. There are some other examples of student involvement in solution of geophysical tasks on the objects of educational geophysical practices with subsequent detailed geological and geophysical interpretation.
About the Author
N. E. FOMENKO
Institute of the Earth Sciences of the Southern Federal Institute
Russian Federation
40, Zorge street, Rostov-na-Donu 344090, Russia
Russian Federation
40, Zorge street, Rostov-na-Donu 344090, Russia
References
1. Bobachev А.А. Bol’shakov D.K., Modin I.N., Shevnin V.А. Elektrorazvedka: posobie po ehlektrorazvedochnoj praktike dlya studentov geofizicheskikh spetsial’nostej. T.II. Maloglubinnaya ehlektrorazvedka / Pod red. prof. V.А. Shevnina, dots. А.А. Bobacheva [Electric surveying: a textbook on electric surveying practice for students of geophysical specialities, vol. II, Shallow-depth electric surveying, edition. 2, revised and enlarged]. M., MSU Publ, 2013, 123 p. (in Russia).
2. Bryankin K.V., Аvdeeva А.V., Bryankina L.V. Systems of quality provision for educational programs on the basis of principles of the Bologna process. Journal of Computer-Sovremennye problemy nauki i obrazovaniya, 2018, no 1, RL: http://science- education.ru/ ru/article/view?id=27371 (date accessed: 09.05.2018). (in Russia).
3. Dronova E.А., Pleshakova А.N., Rud’ D.А., Fomenko N.E. Geoecological surveying of the floodplain of the Temernik River on the territory of the Botanical Garden of the Southern Federal University with a complex of geophysical and atmochemical approaches. Problemy geologii i osvoeniya nedr. Trudy XVI Mezhdunarodnogo simpoziuma imeni akademika M.А. Usova studentov i molodykh uchenykh, posvyashhennogo 110-letiyu so dnya osnovaniya gorno-geologicheskogo obrazovaniya v Sibiri. [Problems of Geology and exploitation of mineral resources. Proceedings of the XVI international Symposium named after academician M. A. Usov of students and young scientists, dedicated to the 110th anniversary of mining and geological education in Siberia], Tomsk, TPI Publ, 2012, pp. 530–532. (In Russia).
4. Kostitsyn V.N. Obrazovatel’naya i nauchnaya deyatel’nost’ kafedry geofiziki Permskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. [Educational and scientific activity of the department of geophysics of the Perm State University] Geofizicheskij vestnik — Geophysical Bulletin, 2010, no 1, pp. 14–18. (In Russian).
5. Mamyashev V.G. Geofiziki i geologi budush- hego. [Geophysicists and geologists of the future] Geofizika — Geophysics, 2015, no 4, pp. 57–64. (In Russian).
6. Popov V.V. Kak nas uchili i kak uchim my. [How we were taught and how do we teach], Karotazhnik — of Well logging, 2013, no 2 (224), pp. 96–113. (In Russian).
7. Romanovskaya I.А. A development of innovation position of teachers of the higher school in the process of organizational learning. Journal of Computer-Sovremennye problemy nauki i obrazovaniya, 2013, no 2. URL: http://science-education.ru/ru/article/view?id=9093 (date accessed: 09.05.2018). (in Russia)
8. Usova A.V., Yashalova N.N., Il`yasov A.A., Ruban D.A. Prikladny`e aspekty` razvitiya uchebnoj motivacii studentov [Applied aspects of de velopment students’ educational motivation.] Vestnik Cherepoveczkogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta — Herald of Cherepovets state University, 2017, no 2(77), pp. 170–178. (In Russian).
9. Shnejder E.M., Dimitryuk YU.S., Tamoshkina E.V. Innovation changes in the modern higher education of Russia. Journal of Computer-Sovremennye problemy nauki i obrazovaniya 2017, no 5. URL: http://science-education.ru/ru/article/view?id=26813 (date accessed: 09.05.2018). (in Russia)
10. Baldridge W.S., Bedrosian, P.A., Biehler S., Braile L.W., Ferguson J.F., Folsom M., Jiracek, G.R., Kelley S.A., McPhee D.K., Pellerin L., Snelson C.M. Summer of Applied Geophysical Experience (SAGE): Training for our future geoscientists, vol. 34, Issue 10, October 2015, pp. 1214–1219.
11. Paolo Dell’Aversana. Neurobiological Background of Exploration Geosciences. New Methods for Data Analysis Based on Cognitive Criteria, Chapter 8 – Applications to Education in Geosciences, 2017, pp. 171–183.
12. Seong WonHan. National education systems and gender gaps in STEM occupational expectations. International Journal of Educational Development, vol. 49, July 2016, pp. 175–187.
Review
For citations:
FOMENKO N.E. ON METHODOLOGY OF TEACHING GEOPHYSICAL COURSES AT THE INSTITUTE OF EARTH SCIENCES, SFU. Proceedings of higher educational establishments. Geology and Exploration. 2018;(4):68-76. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.32454/0016-7762-2018-4-68-76
Views:
381
Email this article 