геология и разведка
Preview

Proceedings of higher educational establishments. Geology and Exploration

Advanced search

Paragenetic relations of minerals in the Snezhnoye ruby deposit, Muzkol-Rangkul anticlinorium, Central Pamir

https://doi.org/10.32454/0016-7762-2024-66-4-101-111

Abstract

Background. The mineral association of ruby in the Snezhnoye deposit is represented by 7 rock-forming and 19 accessory minerals. Here, all minerals vary in their composition due to isomorphism. The conducted paragenetic analysis of minerals from marble-hosted ruby deposits identified four groups of rocks. Out of them, three groups are divided into series according to the dominant mineral: plagioclase, scapolite, and mica associations. The fourth group comprises monomineralic ruby. The studied minerals exhibit 16 parageneses, including two-, three-, and four-mineral forms. The diversity and uneven manifestation of paragenesis is determined by the variable chemical composition of protolith (bauxite-like sediment), the metamorphogenic transformation of which led to the emergence of Snezhnoye and other deposits.

Aim. To identify paragenetic relations between rock-forming minerals of ruby-bearing deposits.

Materials and methods. The methods of paragenetic analysis, the foundations of which were developed by D.S. Korzhinsky, were used. Three groups of inert elements were selected from the actual mineral and chemical compositions of the Snezhnoye ruby deposits and other ruby-bearing objects of the Muzkol series: (1) Si, (2) Al, and (3) the sum of Ca, Mg, Na, and K. Mineral compositions were calculated in terms of 100% and plotted on triangular diagrams. Then, on the basis of observations in samples and sections on the diagrams, the parageneses were connected by tie-lines for analysis.

Results. The conducted paragenetic analysis of minerals from marble-hosted ruby deposits identified four groups of rocks. Out of them, three groups are divided into series according to the dominant mineral: plagioclase, scapolite, and mica associations. The fourth group comprises monomineralic ruby. The studied minerals exhibit 16 parageneses, including two-, three-, and four-mineral forms. The diversity and uneven manifestation of paragenesis is determined by the variable chemical composition of protolith (bauxite-like sediment), the metamorphogenic transformation of which led to the emergence of Snezhnoye and other deposits.

Conclusion. The use of paragenetic analysis when investigating the metamorphogenic ruby deposit under study produced reliable results, which were further tested at nearby deposits and occurrences. The obtained materials can be used when prospecting new marble-hosted deposits of the Muzkol metamorphic series.

About the Authors

A. K. Litvinenko
Sergo Ordzhonikidze Russian State University for Geological Prospecting
Russian Federation

Andrey K. Litvinenko — Dr. of Sci. (Geol.-Min.), Professor of the Department of Minerology and Gemmologu 

23, Miklukho-Maklaya str., Moscow 117997



Sh. A. Odinaev
Guangzhou Institute of Geochemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences; Institute of Geology, Earthquake Engineering and Seismology, National Academy of Sciences of Tajikistan
China

Sharifjon A. Odinaev — Cand. of Sci. (Geol.-Mineral.), PhD student of Guangzhou Institute of Geochemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences; senior Research, Institute of geology, earthquake engineering and seismology, National Academy of Sciences of Tajikistan

Kehuad Str., Guangzhou 511, 

267, Ayni str., Dushanbe 734063



References

1. Barkhatov B.P. Tektonika Pamira (Tectonics of the Pamirs). Leningrad: LGU, 1963. 241 p. (In Russ.).

2. Budanova K.T. Metamorphic Formations of Tadjikistan. Dushanbe: Donish, 1991. 336 p. (In Russ.).

3. Budanov V.I., Endogenous Formations of Pamirs. Dushanbe: Donish, 1993. 299 p. (In Russ.).

4. Geological map of the Tajik SSR and adjacent territories. Scale 1:500 000. Ed. by N.G. Vlasov. Moscow: VSEGEI, 1989 (In Russ.).

5. Glebovitsky V.A., Sedova I.S., Dufour M.S. Evolution of metamorphic belts of the alpine type. Leningrad: Nauka, 1981. 304 p. (In Russ.).

6. Dmitriev, E.A. Types of corundum mineralization in the Precambrian marbles of the Muzkol-Rangkulsky anticlinorium. In Proceedings on Geology and Prospecting of the Gemstone Deposits of Tajikistan; Klimkin, A.V., Ed.; Donish: Dushanbe, Tajikistan, 1987. P. 34—36 (In Russ.).

7. Korzhinsky D.S. Theoretical foundations of the analysis of mineral paragenesis. Moscow: Nauka, 1973. 288 p. (In Russ.).

8. Litvinenko, A.K. The reconstruction of bauxite-like sediments in the Early Proterozoic metamorphites of the Central Pamir. In Proceedings of the Materials of the 5th All-Russian Lithologic Conference “the Types of Sedimentogenesis and Lithogenesis and Their Evolution in the History of the Earth”, Ekaterinburg, Russia, 14–16 October 2008. P. 428—430 (In Russ.).

9. Litvinenko A.K. Nuristan-South Pamir province of Precambrian gems. Geology of ore deposits. 2004. Vol. 46. No. 4. P. 305—312 (In Russ.).

10. Litvinenko A.K. Mineragenia of precious stones of the Nuristan-South Pamir province. Germany: Palmarium academic publishing. 2012. 325 p. (In Russ.).

11. Litvinenko A.K., Nasriddinov Z.Z. Gemological properties of rubies from the Snezhnoye deposit, Central Pamir. Proceedings of Higher Educational Institutions. Geology and exploration. 2014. No. 4. P. 22—26 (In Russ.).

12. Litvinenko A.K. Geology of Snezhnoe Ruby Deposit, Central Pamirs. Moscow. Gornaya kniga, 2020. 103 p. (In Russ.).

13. Dismemberment of stratified and intrusive formations in Tajikistan. Dushanbe: Donish, 1976. 267 p. (In Russ.).

14. Rossovskiy L.N., Konovalenko S.I., Ananjev S.A. Conditions of ruby formation in marbles. Geology of ore deposits. 1982. No. 2. P. 57—66 (In Russ.).

15. Sorokina E.S., Ozhogina E.G., Jacob D.E., Hofmeister W. Some features of corundum ontogeny and the quality of ruby from Snezhnoe deposit, Tajikistan (the Eastern Pamirs). Zapiski RMO (Proc. Russ. Mineral. Soc.) 2012. No. 6. P. 100—108 (In Russ.).

16. Giuliani G., Ohnenstetter D., Fallick A.E., Groat L., Fagan A.G. The geology and genesis of gem corundum deposits. In Geology of Gem Deposits, 2nd ed.; Groat, L.A., Ed.; Mineralogical Association of Canada: Tucson, AZ, USA, 2014. P. 29—112.

17. Giuliani G., Groat L.A., Fallick A.E., Pignatelli I., Pardieu V. Ruby Deposits: A review and Geological Classification. Minerals. 2020. Vol. 10. P. 597—681. https://doi.org/10.3390/min10070597

18. Litvinenko A.K., Sorokina E.A., Häger T., Kostitsyn Y.A., Botcharnikov R.E., Somsikova A.V., Ludwig T., Romashova T.V. and Hofmeister W. Petrogenesis of the Snezhnoe ruby deposite, Central Pamir. Minerals. 2020. Vol. 10. No. 478. P. 478—500. https://doi.org/10.3390/min10050478

19. Kissin A.J. Ruby and Sapphire from the Southern Ural Mountains, Russia. Gem & Gemmology. 1994. Vol. 30. No. 4. P. 234—252.

20. Sorokina E.S., Litvinenko A.K., Hofmeister W., Häger T., Jacob D.E., Nasriddinov Z.Z. Rubies and Sapphires from Snezhnoe, Tajikistan. Gem & Gemmology. 2015. Vol. 51. No. 2. P. 160—175. http://dx.doi.org/10.5741/GEMS.51.2.160.


Review

For citations:


Litvinenko A.K., Odinaev Sh.A. Paragenetic relations of minerals in the Snezhnoye ruby deposit, Muzkol-Rangkul anticlinorium, Central Pamir. Proceedings of higher educational establishments. Geology and Exploration. 2024;66(4):101-111. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.32454/0016-7762-2024-66-4-101-111

Views: 344


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 0016-7762 (Print)
ISSN 2618-8708 (Online)