New ichnological findings in Hauterivian sandstones of Mountainous Adygeya
https://doi.org/10.32454/0016-7762-2024-66-4-8-16
Abstract
Background. Trace fossils are highly informative objects for geological investigations. However, the information about their distribution in sedimentary settings lacks completeness. The conducted field studies of sandstones of the Hauterivian age in the northern part of Mountainous Adygeya (Western Caucasus) established, to the best of our knowledge, for the first time the presence of ichnofossils in one of their members.
Aim. Characterization and interpretation of an ichnofossil assemblage from Hauterivian sandstones of Mountainous Adygeya.
Materials and methods. Field investigations included in-situ search and documentation of ichnofossils, as well as their sampling. In the course of laboratory investigations, ichnofossils were interpreted; bioturbation and ichnofacies were evaluated. In addition, petrographical and XRD methods were used to analyze the matter that fills the most widespread traces.
Results. The established ichnofossils are distinguished by a low diversity. They can be identified as Ophiomorpha isp., ?Ophiomorpha isp., Skolithos isp., ?Taenidium isp. The latter species, although occurring most commonly, are least clear and hard to identify. Bioturbation is weak, although increasing in particular loci. The ichnofacial interpretation is uncertain due to the coexistence of elements typical of the Scoyenia and Scolithos ichnofacies.
Discussion. The studied ichnofossils indicate the activity of shrimps, insects, and worms both on the surface and inside the sediment. The latter accumulated under the conditions of a subaerial part of the river delta near its stream section. Apparently, in the Hauterivian Stage, the area under study was represented by a land mass.
Conclusion. The results obtained during the conducted ichnological study of Hauterivian sandstones of Mountainous Adygeya are not only interesting per se, but also serve as an important indicator of sedimentation environments.
Keywords
About the Authors
D. A. RubanRussian Federation
Dmitry A. Ruban — Ph. D. (University of Pretoria, South Africa), Cand. Sci. (Geol.-Min.), Docent, Associate Professor at the Southern Federal University
43, 23 Liniya str., Rostov-on-Don 344019
S. O. Zorina
Russian Federation
Svetlana O. Zorina — Dr. Sci. (Geol.-Min.), Docent, Professor
18, Kremlevskaya str., Kazan 420008
K. I. Nikashin
Russian Federation
Konstantin I. Nikashin — post-graduate student
18, Kremlevskaya str., Kazan 420008
N. Mohammad
Russian Federation
Nosheen Mohammad — post-graduate student
18, Kremlevskaya str., Kazan 420008
References
1. Baraboshkin E.E. Borings of Gastrochaenolites ips. in phosphorites of the Zone Dorsoplanites panderi (Volgian Stage of the Upper Jurassic) of Moscow and Moscow’s vicinities. Proceedings of the Geological Institute. 2017. No. 615. P. 320—325 (In Russ.).
2. Drushits V.V., Mikhailova I.A. Biostratigraphy of the Lower Cretaceous of the Northern Caucasus. Moscow: MSU, 1966. 190 p. (In Russ.).
3. Kolesnikov A.V., Desyatkin V.D., Terekhova V.A., Pan’kov V.N., Maslov A.V. The oldest trace fossils in association with the biota of Ediacaran type from the Upper Vendian of the South Urals. Reports of the Russian Academy of Sciences. Earth Sciences. 2023. No. 2. P. 281—288 (In Russ.).
4. Popov A.Yu., Shurygin B.N. An ichnotaxon Rosselia from the basal horizons of the Cap Airkat (North Siberia). Geology and Geopysics. 2020. No. 2. P. 263—274 (In Russ.).
5. Staroverov V.N., Grebennikova A.V. Genetic significance of ichnofossils for the lithologic-facial investigations of Middle Devonian and Early Carboniferous rocks in the southeast of the Volga-Ural anteclise. Interiors of Volga and Precaspian. 2018. No. 95. P. 29—50 (In Russ.).
6. Ruban D.A. Geological investigations in Mountainous Adygeya. Rostov-on-Don: DGTU-Print, 2024. 149 p. (In Russ.).
7. Stratigraphical dictionary of the USSR. Leningrad: Nedra, 1979. 592 p. (In Russ.).
8. Buatois L.A., Mangano M.A. Ichnology: Organismsubstrate interactions in space and time. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011. 358 p.
9. Frey R.W., Howard J.D., Pryor W.A. Ophiomorpha: Its morphologic, taxonomic, and environmental significance. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology. 1978. V. 23. P. 199—229.
10. Haq B.U. Cretaceous eustasy revisited. Global and Planetary Change. 2014. V. 113. P. 44—58.
11. Rodríguez-Tovar F.J., Alcalá L., Cobos A. Taenidium at the lower Barremian El Hoyo dinosaur tracksite (Teruel, Spain): Assessing palaeoenvironmental conditions for the invertebrate community. Cretaceous Research. 2016. V. 65. P. 48—58.
12. Ruban D.A. Islands in the Caucasian Sea in Three Mesozoic Time Slices: Novel Dimension of Geoheritage and Geotourism. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering. 2022. V. 10. P. 1300.
13. Thacker H.A., Hembree D.I. Neoichnological study of two species of burrowing darkling beetles (Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae) from larval to adult stages. Ichnos. 2021. V. 28. P. 290—308.
14. Trace Fossils as Indicators of Sedimentary Environments. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2012. 924 p.
Review
For citations:
Ruban D.A., Zorina S.O., Nikashin K.I., Mohammad N. New ichnological findings in Hauterivian sandstones of Mountainous Adygeya. Proceedings of higher educational establishments. Geology and Exploration. 2024;66(4):8-16. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.32454/0016-7762-2024-66-4-8-16