ANALYSIS OF THE RESULTS OF INVESTIGATIONS AIMED AT REDUCING THE ROCK STRENGTH IN SERIAL EXPLOSIONS OF BOREHOLE EXPLOSIVE CHARGES
https://doi.org/10.32454/0016-7762-2020-63-1-39-45
Abstract
In a quasistatic simulation of a single explosion leading to rock destruction, the nature of the propagation of radial cracks in the rock resulting from the pressure of the shock wave, detonation products, and stress concentration in the vicinity of the crack tips was revealed. Moreover, the growth of cracks in granite due the explosion occurs within 15 ms, and in limestone within 20—25 ms, depending on the physicomechanical properties of rocks, their degree of fracturing, and the use of a special type of tamping. The operating principle of the locking tamping is based on the reflection of shock waves from the internal funnel-shaped profile, as a result of which a partial detonation of the detonation products occurs. Tamping retention in the borehole is maintained due to its expansion by detonation products.
From the analysed studies conducted in laboratory conditions, the strength of ore limestone and magnetite samples after a single explosive loading was found to decrease by 38.6 and 40.8% of the initial static compressive strength, respectively, and after repeated exposure, on average, 5-10%. The dimensions of the zone of reduced strength in the surrounding massif was found to be dependent on the height of the quarry ledge and the energy characteristics of applied explosives.
About the Authors
K. S. MalskiyRussian Federation
Cand. Sci. (Tech.), Dean, Faculty of Oil and Gas Geology and Geophysics
23, Miklukho-Maklay str., Moscow 117997, Russia
tel.: +7 (925) 150-19-88
SPIN: 5466-5425
Yu. A. Borovkov
Russian Federation
Dr. Sci. (Tech.), Prof., Department of Geotechnological Methods and Physical Processes of Mining, Faculty of Engineering, Prospecting and Mining
23, Miklukho-Maklay str., Moscow 117997, Russia
SPIN: 5810-5657
References
1. Kuznetsov G.V., Ulibin V.P. Change in the magnitude of the seismic effect of explosions at a quarry depending on various factors. In the collection: Blasting. Мoscow, Nedra, 1992, no. 71/28, pp. 174—180. (In Russian).
2. Kutuzov B.N. Blasting Methods. P. 1. Rock destruction. Мoscow, Gornaya Kniga, 2007, 636 p. (in Russian).
3. Mets Y.S. Rock crushing. In the collection: Blasting. Мoscow, Nedra, 1984, no. 86/43, pp. 81—89. (In Russian).
4. Morozov V.N. Engineering-geological studies and predictive evaluation of fracturing of ore deposits. Cand. sci. diss. St. Petersburg, 2006, 163 p. (In Russian).
5. Orlenko L.P. Explosion and Impact Physics. Мoscow, Fizmatlit, 2006, 304 p. (in Russian).
6. Explosion physics / Ed. L.P. Orlenko. 3rd edition, corrected. 2 v. Мoscow, Fizmatlt, 2004, 488 p. (In Russian).
7. Yurovskikh А.V. Development of a model of rock destruction at the quasistatic stage of the explosion: Abstract of the Cand. technical sci. diss. St. Petersburg, 2003, 20 p. (In Russian).
8. Akande J.M., Lawal A.I. Optimization of Blasting Parameters Using Regression Models in Ratcon and NSCE Granite Quarries, Ibadan, Oyo State, Nigeria. Geomaterials, 2013, no. 03:01, pp. 28—37.
9. Lusk B., Silva J. (2018). Energy Distribution in the Blast Fragmentation Process. Chapter in Green Energy and Technology. In book: Energy Efficiency in the Minerals Industry, pp. 11—30. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-54199-0_2
Review
For citations:
Malskiy K.S., Borovkov Yu.A. ANALYSIS OF THE RESULTS OF INVESTIGATIONS AIMED AT REDUCING THE ROCK STRENGTH IN SERIAL EXPLOSIONS OF BOREHOLE EXPLOSIVE CHARGES. Proceedings of higher educational establishments. Geology and Exploration. 2020;1(1):39-45. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.32454/0016-7762-2020-63-1-39-45