Definition of the areas of space affecting results of the radio-wave method
https://doi.org/10.32454/0016-7762-2019-3-72-76
Abstract
It is known that in the insulator the area that has the main influence on the propagation of electromagnetic waves,is determined by the radius of the first Fresnel zone. But rocks are conductive medium. Examples of the results of calculations have been given, illustrating which area of the conducting space can have a significant impact on the re sults of the radio-wave method. In the given approach, each element A Vi of a conducting space, differing in electrical parameters from all other elements, is a source of a secondary electromagnetic field, similar to the field of an alternating electric dipole. The results of mathematical modeling can help to determine which area of the conducting medium under certain conditions has the main influence on the results of radio wave method. Simulation results can determine which region of the conductive medium has a major influence on the results of radio-wave method.
About the Authors
A. D. Karinskiy
Russian State Geological Prospecting University
Russian Federation
23, Miklouho-Maklay's street, Moscow 117997.
Russian Federation
23, Miklouho-Maklay's street, Moscow 117997.
N. M. Kuznetsov
Radionda LTD
Russian Federation
Post office box 44, Moscow 121614.
Russian Federation
Post office box 44, Moscow 121614.
References
1. Karinskiy A.D., Dayev D.S. Ob oblastyakh prostranstva, sushchestvenno vliyayushchikh na rezul‘taty izmereniy v elektromagnitnykh metodakh. [Karinskiy A.D., Daev D.S. About determination the area of space, significantly influencing on measurement’s results in electromagnetic methods of geophysics] The Russian Geophysics Journal, 2012, issue 6, pp. 42–53. (In Russian).
2. Karinskiy A.D., Dayev D.S., Mazitova I.K. Matematicheskoye modelirovaniye S-effekta i R-effekta v metodakh soprotivleniy elektrorazvedki. [Karinskiy A.D., Daev D.S., Mazitova I.K. Mathematical modeling C-effect and P-effect in the methods of apparent resistance in electrical survey]. The Russian Geophysics Journal, 2014, issue 1, pp. 36–45.(In Russian)
3. Karinskiy A.D., Dayev D.S., Mazitova I.K., Yudin M.N. Matematicheskoye modelirovaniye vliyaniya lokal’nykh ob"yek-tov na rezul’taty metodov soprotivleniy elektrorazvedki. Sbornik nauchnykh trudov, pp. 122–126. [Karinskiy A.D., Daev D.S., Mazitova I.K., Yudin M.N. Mathematical modeling of the local objects influence on the results of the methods of aparent resistance in electrical survey. [Mezhdunarodnaya nauchno-prakticheskaya konferentsiya «Teoriya i praktika razvedochnoy i promyslovoy geofiziki», g. Perm’, 24–26 noyabrya 2016 g.] Theory and practice of exploration and petroleum geophysics. Collection of scientific papers. Perm, 2016, pp. 122–126.(In Russian)
4. Karinskiy A.D., Dayev D.S. Vliyaniye lokal’nykh ob"yektov na rezul’taty elektrorazvedki metodom soprotivleniy; opyt matema-ticheskogo modelirovaniya [Karinskiy A.D., Daev D.S. Influence of local objects on the resistivity method results; experience of mathematical modeling] [«Geofizika». Nauchno-tekhnicheskiy zhurnal. YEAGO, 2017, no 1, pp. 35–44.The Russian Geophysics Journal, 2017, issue 1, pp. 35–44]. (In Russian).
5. Kuznetsov N.M. Sposob 3D obrabotki dannykh radiovolnovogo prosvechivaniya mezhskvazhinnogo prostranstva. Vestnik KRAUNTS. Nauki o Zemle. 2012, no 1, vypusk N 19, S. 240–246. [Kuznetsov N. M. Method for 3D data processing of radio wave scandling of the interwell space. Bulletin KRAUNZ. Earth Sciences, 2012, no. 1, Issue no. 19, pp. 240–246]. (In Russian)
6. Petrovskiy A.A., Dostovalov B.N. Pervyye opyty prosvechivaniya vechnoy merzloty elektromagnitnymi volnami. (Trudy instituta merzlotovedeniya AN SSSR. 1947. T. 5. S. 121–160). [Petrovskiy A.A., Dostovalov B.N. The first experiments of permafrost scanning by electromagnetic waves. Proceedings of the Institute of Permafrost of the Academy of Sciences of the USSR, 1947, V. 5, pp. 121–160]. (In Russian)
7. Svetov B.S. Osnovy geoelektriki. [Svetov B.S. Geoelectrics basics. M., Publisher LKI, 2008, 656 p.(In Russian)
8. Loke M.H. and Dahlin T.A comparison of the Gauss-Newton and quasi-Newton methods in resistivity imaging inversion. Journal of Applied Geophysics, 2002, 49, pp. 149–162.
9. McGillivray P.R. and Oldenburg D.W. Methods for calculating Frechet derivatives and sensitivities for the non-linear inverse problem: a comparative study. Geophysical Prospecting, 1990, 38, pp. 499–524.
Review
For citations:
Karinskiy A.D., Kuznetsov N.M. Definition of the areas of space affecting results of the radio-wave method. Proceedings of higher educational establishments. Geology and Exploration. 2019;(3):72-76. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.32454/0016-7762-2019-3-72-76
Views:
405
Email this article 